Comment on November 12th, 2009.
Hi Prof.:)
Nice review. I have been looking for a replacement lens for Nikon Kit Lens since I bought a D5000 months ago. Searching thru sigma 24-70 f/2.8 and any Tamron made lens for my little budget to spend on kit lens handicap at night shooting.
I bought a Tamron 17-50 F/2.8 without VC somedays ago in png. My first impression about this lens is solid!, that is few streets ahead of my existing 18-55mm Kit Lens in term of sharpness, contrast, warmer tone, details except focusing speed as you point out earlier on.
Personally I have tried the VC version, VC helps in certain situation but keeping it on may not always producing somethings that you would expecting it to be. I am more concern about its focusing consistency rather than VC. So I left the shop with VC lens hand it back to merchant.
I agree with your point that why big player not putting VR in their medium zoom lens. My personal view point is, most photographers do not need VR/VC at this optical range for outdoor. Shooting 50mm @ F/2.8-4.0 is as good as entering nobody street like Nikon 35mm F/1.8G. It is fast and most of the time I am getting a shuttle speed faster than 1/100s..a very very comfortable hand held zone.
At night, I just simply turn multiple shot shuttle on and firing 4-8 shoots and then pick a right picture out of them. So my good 1/4s shot is not any worse than picture with VC.
With a little more shuttle firing which I found VC version is not worth more than 400+ to pay for. At this price I would rather pay for a affortable decent 50mm/1.8D by hand focusing yet better speed at low light.
I am appreciate if you have read till this line. I am looking forward to see more pictures comparing your screw driver lens and new VC lens.
Cheers.
Comment on November 12th, 2009.
Hi Louie,
Appreciate your feedback.
Did you compare the focusing speed of the Built in Motor version with the VC version? Are you using Nikon or Canon system?
For me the biggest improvement in the VC version in Nikon mount is the focusing speed. The built in motor version is just too slow.
Comment on November 12th, 2009.
Hi Kho King,
Yes, I am Nikon D5000 user.
I did the comparison at the shop. VC is significantly faster than motorize (MKII?) version, less twisting torque and zigging less. But not as impressive as Sigma version of HSM and not even close behind to Nikon AF-S system, both later make photographer like a lame.
I always comparing this Tamron with Kit lens. Yes, for daylight shooting, Kit Lens ranked second of responding to focus locking..slightly behind 35mm/1.8G, and better than Tamron. At this speed, it is faster than my hand indeed.
During the night, Tamron tops Kit lens in second place. While 35mm remains its crown.
So do you recommend VC over motorized for additional 400+?
Comment on November 12th, 2009.
Hi Louie,
For just the improvement of AF speed, I would recommend the VC version. I can hardly recommend the Built in Motor version nowadays due to its really slow AF speed…
Comment on November 12th, 2009.
Thanks KhoKing,
Perhaps this is my last investment on DX lens for my need. I will be more interested looking into FF exceptional optical lens. Again before I can own a FF. Here is the list of what I plan.
Flash SB900
Indoor event 24-70 f/2.8. probably I will let go my 17-50.
Tele 70-300 f/x
Wide Angle 1x-24 f/x
50/1.4..
Do email me if you have a good deal..
huchew nùon?
Comments can contain some xhtml. Names and emails are required (emails aren't displayed), url's are optional.