Comment on March 22nd, 2008.
According to your argument, its already the past the moment we refer to the present, yes?
Sounds weird.
Its like saying: I was typing in english. Technically, I’m typing now. By the time I finish typing a comment addressing to you, i’m no longer typing even though my fingers are moving as I type. So, I was typing in english now.
Doesn’t make much sense to me… (i mean, both your argument and the things i typed)
Comment on March 22nd, 2008.
I mean…
it should be “I am typing in english” instead of “I was typing in english”, yes?
Comment on March 22nd, 2008.
Hi 3POINT8,
Your argument is valid, because you typed in English and that is a fact that doesn’t change with time. After an hour, a few days…or even thousand years, what you have typed are still English, it will not change and is not bounded by time.
However, when you said “I am who I am”, this is NOT CORRECT. Why? Because you changed. Your hair grows longer, your skin grows older, your body changes. So, you are no longer who you are a second ago.
Hope this clears the doubt. ![]()
Comments can contain some xhtml. Names and emails are required (emails aren't displayed), url's are optional.