DR KOH KHO KING

109 Responses to “Review: Tokina 11-16mm F2.8 Apherical AT-X 116 PRO DX”

1. JP Denk Says:
   March 5th, 2008 at 1:48 am

   Thanks for sharing these photos. The second one is especially fun. I like the expression on your daughter’s face, and the way she is holding out her hands.

   I was wondering, did you crop any of these photos? From what I can see, there is no odd distortion/softness at the edges, even at f/2.8. This was a big problem with my Nikon 12-24 mm. Are you pleased with the image quality of this lens? Have you used any of the other lenses in this category (say, the Nikon 12-24 mm or the Sigma 10-20 mm)? Thanks very much. Have a great day!

   JP Denk

2. KhoKing Says:
   March 5th, 2008 at 10:49 am

   Hi JP Denk,

   Thanks for the comments.

   All the photos above are uncropped version. They are all original from Nikon D200, just resized for web purpose.

   I do have some test shots on a wall with posters. I shall post them out later today.

   I have not tried the Nikon 12-24mm nor Sigma 10-20mm, so I can’t comment on the comparison.

   Personally, I must say that I was surprised and shocked by the sharpness of the Tokina AT-X 116 lens! I took some shots of my wife, I can count the hair of her eyebrows! Sorry, can’t post that photo though as she will kill me for posting her funny look with such a wide angle lens.

   I shall update with some full resolution original files later.

3. Terry Ng Says:
   March 5th, 2008 at 7:00 pm

   Yes, please post more pics!!!

4. JP Denk Says:
   March 5th, 2008 at 11:53 pm

   Hello Again, KhoKing:

   Thank you for your return comments. It seems the Tokina 11-16 lens is very sharp. I am pleased to know there is no cropping in your photos. Usually, with my Nikon 12-24, I would have to crop quite a bit from the edges. This area almost always was far too “soft” to use. I will be interested to see any other photos you are able to post. (And I understand about not posting the photo of your wife. My wife also is not eager for her photo to be shown to the world! Thank you for your early review of this lens. So far, it is the only useful performance information I have been able to find.

   Hope you have a fine day.

   JP Denk

5. KhoKing Says:
   March 6th, 2008 at 1:02 am

   Hi Terry and JP Denk,

   Thanks for revisiting my blog.

   I have updated the short review with more photos and some physical comparison with the Tokina AT-X 124 PRO lens.

   Hope you guys enjoy reading.

6. JP Denk Says:
   March 6th, 2008 at 5:37 am

   Thanks again, KhoKing! I appreciate you taking time to share these files and your impressions of the lens. Your input has been extremely helpful. Even pushed at f/2.8 and 11mm settings, this seems to be a very impressive lens. I’m leaning toward purchasing it. Hopefully, it will become available in the US soon. If not, I may purchase it via the Shashinki site. Thanks again for your help. Best wishes to you and your family. And happy photography!

7. Fendrri Says:
   March 6th, 2008 at 11:44 pm

   I’m thinking of getting myself one. I was almost going to buy the tokina 12-24mm last week when suddenly this lens was available at kakaku.com. The difference is about 10.000 yens, but if it’s a much better lens, I’m going to save some cash for the 11-16. Thanks for the short review Koh!

8. Tokina 11-16mm f2.8 apherical AT-X116pro - ScubaBoard Says:
   March 9th, 2008 at 8:10 pm

   [...] Tokina 11-16mm f2.8 apherical AT-X116pro Anyone try this Lens? I hear a lot about the Tokina 11-17……..but this with F2.8 (Is it even useful for WA with regard to DOF)? Here is a review KOH KHO KING � Review: Tokina 11-16mm F2.8 Apherical AT-X 116 PRO DX [...]

9. lkunl Says:
   March 13th, 2008 at 1:29 pm

   Thank you very much for you review and sample pic.
   Could you post some outdoor pic sample.

10. KhoKing Says:
    March 14th, 2008 at 12:58 am

    Hi lkunl,

    I shall get some outdoor shots and some more distortion test samples soon…

11. ene Says:
    March 14th, 2008 at 5:25 pm

    I’m looking too for an Ultra Wide Lens Just to know… how bad is the vignetting on a film camera?

12. KhoKing Says:
    March 14th, 2008 at 5:31 pm

    Hi ene,

    Sorry, I have not tried this lens on film camera. As this lens is meant for DSLR with 1.5X or 1.6X cropped sensor, so you will definitely get pretty bag vignetting or round dark corner for full frame or film SLR.

    Thanks.

13. ene Says:
    March 14th, 2008 at 5:41 pm

    I know that the 12-24 can be used from 16-17mm on 35mm with acceptable vignetting… i was hoping to gain a 16 f2.8 for my f100 maybe it’s too much…

14. KhoKing Says:
    March 14th, 2008 at 5:43 pm

    Anybody wanna lend me a D3 for testing?!

15. BK Says:
    March 15th, 2008 at 12:19 am

    KKK, get D3 from your own stocks for testing…

16. KhoKing Says:
    March 15th, 2008 at 12:32 am

    BK, my wife asked me to get your phone number…she wants to discuss something with you “seriously”…

    Nah…with a baby commitment now, I have to use my money wisely…no more luxury…

17. lkunl Says:
    March 15th, 2008 at 3:32 am

    KhoKing

    one more question.
    How about color saturation of 11-16 compare to 12-24 Tokina.
    I use 12-24 tokina and I think 12-24 tokina is less color saturate compare to Nikon lens.

    Thank you very much

    lkunl

18. KhoKing Says:
    March 16th, 2008 at 1:59 am

    Hi lkunl,

    I did not do test comparison of the two lenses, so can’t really comment on that.

    Color saturation is very much depends on your DSLR, and it can be easily punched in during computer editing.

    Do that note that I did not dial in extra sharpness in my Nikon D200, as I prefer to do it in computer post processing later. In my mug shot above, I can easily unsharp mask and get very sharp final image. So, don’t blame the lens for unsharp images, but do appreciate the details it delivers.

    I have just uploaded another TWO distortion test images at 11mm and 16mm.

19. lkunl Says:
    March 16th, 2008 at 3:44 am

    Distortion also very good controlled like Tokina 12-24.

    Thank you for new image sample.

20. KhoKing Says:
    March 17th, 2008 at 5:33 pm

    For those who are interested in seeing a defective Tokina AT-X 116 PRO lens with bad coating:

    http://shashinki.com/blog/2008/03/16/a-defective-tokina-at-x-116-pro-11-16mm-lens/

    

21. Paul Says:
    March 18th, 2008 at 3:14 pm

    Here is an interesting link in Japanese giving more examples.　Scroll down below the Japanese text for test images.

    http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/lens_review/2008/03/03/8016.html

22. Alan Says:
    March 22nd, 2008 at 9:49 am

    Hi there,

    I think a lot of people are wondering about how this lens handles flare, since this focal length will be used outdoors a lot. I guess the simplest way to check is just to go outdoors and have the sun just out of frame or in the very corners…

    Anyways, thanks for posting what you’ve already gotten up!

23. Alan Says:
    March 22nd, 2008 at 10:29 am

    Also, how are chromatic abberations? These are less of a problem for me but I know others have been wanting to see how this lens performs in terms of that.

24. KhoKing Says:
    March 25th, 2008 at 12:00 pm

    Hi Alan,

    I will do some flare resistance test soon…

25. cinman Says:
    March 30th, 2008 at 1:36 am

    I have just bought from ebay japan store. First impressions : after using canon 10-22 and sigma 10-20 : this lens is different . manuel focus–automatic focus ring is very fine (this is first time for tokina )
    and lens is so silent
    lens focus is very good
    lens body is very good
    sharpness is not bad
    I am not pro so I dont know how to revew a lens ::)

26. Ahandre Says:
    March 30th, 2008 at 5:05 pm

    hi Khoking.

    excellent review. I wonder if Normal thickness B+W CPL filter will cause vignetting ? Possible to test on your side ?

27. KhoKing Says:
    March 31st, 2008 at 12:44 am

    Just updated with flare test photos. Well done, Tokina!

28. subra Says:
    April 1st, 2008 at 12:18 pm

    kk, whats the price of the ATX 116 PRO,do you have the stock ? Good review!

29. KhoKing Says:
    April 1st, 2008 at 12:19 pm

    Hi Subra,

    Thanks for the compliments.

    You can order the lens at:

    http://shashinki.com/shop/advanced_search_result.php?keywords=tokina+at-x+116&x=0&y=0

30. Cotku Says:
    April 5th, 2008 at 4:47 pm

    Ken Rockwell also did a glowing review of this lens (www.kenrockwell.com/tokina/11-16mm.htm). If it perfoms as well as it appears, I suspect Tokina will have a backorder situation once it hits the U.S

31. A Smit Says:
    April 19th, 2008 at 7:40 pm

    Excellent review. Helped me make my decision regarding the lens

32. hanglun Says:
    April 27th, 2008 at 11:12 am

    Thank your sharing.Can your compare canon 10-22 and tokina 11-16 which one better,this two lens price close.

33. Kader - mein Foto-Blog » Blog Archive » Tokina 11-16 Says:
    May 3rd, 2008 at 7:13 am

    [...] denen man sich von der Qualität des 11-16 überzeugen kann: – KennRockwell.com – Impress Watch – Koh Kho King – PBase Cameras – Flickr – Photozone – Photoscala – [...]

34. Gandalf Says:
    May 11th, 2008 at 6:18 am

    Thank you VERY MUCH for the flare/ghosting check.

    I really appreciate that, and I have ordered the lens at E-Bay – it is the only place to get it for the time being, I will not wait untill it arrives in Denmark in a month or so.

35. Michael Says:
    May 29th, 2008 at 3:18 pm

    Thanks for the review KK. After reading yours and Ken Rockwell’s reviews I almost succumbed to the temptation today while watching a customer at a shop took one out to play with. I’m sure the lens is shaprer than anything in this range but I’m still tossed about whether I’d want to lose the practicality of having 4mm more on the long end of my Sigma 10-20 which has so far, served me very well. Thus far, the arguments for giving up on my 10-20 are — (i) f2.8 makes indoor shots so much easier to handle compared to the very slow f4-5.6 (ii) much better sharpness on the edge compared to the 10-20 according to the reviews (iii) it looks like a smaller and lighter lens compared to the Sigma. In the “against” camp – (i) 11-16 range is in all practicality, a fixed focus lens (ii) CA appear to be a problem (iii) lose 1mm on the wide end which is not a big deal (iv) a lighter wallet (though in HK here, it costs only HK$3,800 (apr. US$500) which is substantially cheaper than the EUR600 asking that I saw posted elsewhere)

36. Tim Says:
    June 2nd, 2008 at 3:26 pm

    Michael, where in Hong Kong can you find this lens for $3,800 – very few dealers have it and the cheapest qupoted so far is $4,300…? Thanks

37. Jonathan Says:
    June 3rd, 2008 at 4:50 pm

    hi! i’m just wondering how is the customer support for tokina here in KL. I was informed that each time there is a problem for this lens, they have to all the way send the lens to singapore for repair which is I think would take time and hassle to the customer. I hope you can make this known to us because this is the only reason why i don’t buy tokina lenses

38. KhoKing Says:
    June 3rd, 2008 at 4:59 pm

    The distributor of Tokina lenses is a Singapore company, they are controlling the Malaysia market, that is why lenses have to be sent to Singapore when warranty is needed.

    My stock is not from Singapore though, but directly from Japan. I checked and tested every lenses before sending to my customers, trying to minimize the chance of customer getting a bad copy.

39. mycke Says:
    June 13th, 2008 at 12:49 pm

    very nice review. i wish i had the green to buy this lens.

40. glen Says:
    June 24th, 2008 at 7:24 pm

    Just bought and returned my Tokina 11-16mm f2.8. Worked fine for a day and then the zoom range wouldnt go past 12-15mm. Odd. Later the focus range also wouldnt commit the full range(only about a third). Both problems were intermitent but persistent. Its gone back.

41. Donatas Says:
    July 1st, 2008 at 4:59 am

    Hi,Kho King! I have a question regarding lens distortion.(Tokina AT-X 116 PRO DX 11-16mm F2.8)So, as we can see onexemple with metal curtains there is really not much distortion here.But on another exemples with outdoor shoots ,buildings seems to be badly falling inwards.Looks like distortion?Where I am wrong?
    And sorry for my english-still can’t learn it properly.
    Thank You.

42. Chris Says:
    July 1st, 2008 at 7:09 pm

    Donatas the kind of distortions that you can see at the buildings are very well controled with ps and i dont think that is a problem ,at least we are talking for a 11mm lens !!!Sometimes that kind of distortions giving us a very preety effect…

43. Latvis Says:
    July 2nd, 2008 at 5:00 am

    After shooting couple of hours love-hate-relationship begins…
    Maybe it is that lens or my Canon D40 but photos seems to be quite soft.
    Seems also that my Canon with that lens cannot meter light correct…
    Basic skylight / hard contrast makes photos absolutely too dark, sky is burned white, odd colors…
    am I missing something? Should I really use only manual settings? or convert to black & white

    Some snapshots on a rainy day http://rockdata.org/tokina/

    -Latvis

44. CH Says:
    July 3rd, 2008 at 1:38 am

    A lot of this baby is available in Hong Kong now.

45. Mic Says:
    July 8th, 2008 at 10:02 pm

    hi KKK,need ur opinion,is it worth to ” upgrade ” to tokina 11-16 if i oledi got the Canon 10-22mm? The 2.8 and sharpness is very tempting

46. rayt Says:
    July 9th, 2008 at 11:33 am

    I do not own it yet but itching to get one. My question is — will this auto-focus on my Nikon D80? I would appreciate an answer from anybody.

47. KhoKing Says:
    July 9th, 2008 at 11:42 am

    Hi Mic,

    IMO, since you already have the Canon 10-22mm, there is no point to get the Tokina lens just for the F2.8 aperture. For wide angle shots, DOF is normally very deep, and if you are shooting landscape, most of the time you will want to stop down as well.

48. KhoKing Says:
    July 9th, 2008 at 11:42 am

    Hi rayt,

    Yes, you will get AF on your Nikon D80 with this lens.

49. Johann Beckham Says:
    July 9th, 2008 at 1:45 pm

    KK,

    Do u still have stock for this tokina lens now? Im going to Borobudur Jogyakarta on July 18 and I’m thinking of buying this lens. Will this lens be able to deliver within this week?

50. KhoKing Says:
    July 9th, 2008 at 2:00 pm

    Dear Johann,

    Sorry, I sold out the Nikon mount version. New stock will only be available in 2 weeks time.

51. SriPS Says:
    July 19th, 2008 at 9:31 pm

    Thanks alot for the review and (mail). I am pretty much set now! pics really look great! fine by me!
    thanks,

52. dibsy Says:
    August 6th, 2008 at 1:55 am

    Is it worth getting the tokina 11-16mm with the f2.8 over the sigma 10-20mm considering the sigma has been giving great reviews and is slightly cheaper to buy?

53. KhoKing Says:
    August 6th, 2008 at 9:02 am

    Hi Dibsy,

    I think you need to take note that Tokina ATX116 is for digital cropped sensor, while Sigma 10-20mm is a truly fully frame lens. So it depends on your DSLR used.

    Tokina has great built quality and great image quality. While for the Sigma, I am not really sure of the image quality, built is fine though not as good as the Tokina.

54. DIBSY Says:
    August 6th, 2008 at 6:36 pm

    thanks khoking ,i,,m using the nikon d80 so the tokina was made for this body. just worried abit because there has been some negative posts about the tokina saying that even with the f2.8 the images are soft at the higher f stop.
    images are ok from say f8 -f12.Now knowing the sigma is a full frame lens and the rumour is it will take my megapixels down to 5 megapixels i will be buying the tokina for sure.
    thank you very much for your time KHOKING.

55. IBeN Says:
    August 14th, 2008 at 7:57 pm

    hi thanks for the write-up. i’m considering buying a wide angle lens, and this one apparently can be the best choice! Thanks again

56. Joaquin Says:
    August 16th, 2008 at 12:45 am

    Thank you for this review. Really good work. Probably I will adquire the lens.

57. Mik Says:
    August 29th, 2008 at 10:54 pm

    Thanks for the review KhoKing. Very Positive. Having been a Nikon professional shooter exclusively for the past 35 years, for the very first time I’m seriously considering this lens after yours and Ken Rockwell’s reviews. I like the cost and the weight factors as well as the image quality. I’m sick of lugging these bigger and weightier “wide” lenses around, photography starts to become a bit of a chore. Are Tokina lenses, in general , the better of the non camera manufactures lenses of Nikon and Canon. Can you recomend any long distance zoom lenses from these third party lens manufacturers. I shoot Nikon D2Xs. Many thanks again

58. KhoKing Says:
    August 29th, 2008 at 11:07 pm

    Hi Mik,

    Thank you for dropping by! Glad that you found my “review” useful.

    The three main third party lens makers are Tokina, Tamron and Sigma. There is no which one is best. It depends on the lens. For example, my opinion is that Tokina makes the best wide angle lens, while Sigma is better in 70-200mm and telephoto range. Tamron is for its lowest price range among them, and is more popular in 17-70mm range (SP 17-50mm and SP 28-70mm).

    For telephoto lens, non third party makers have IS/VR in them, so I would recommend you get the original Nikon/Canon 70-200mm range, as IS/VR is very useful in such long focal length.

    Sigma does have OS in some of their long range lenses, but still not that popular and not in 70-200mm F2.8 series.

    Hope this helps.

59. Adam Says:
    August 30th, 2008 at 10:41 am

    Hi,
    After reading your review and comments here I bought this lens here in USA. Got it today! I think that it is nice build. Took some photo with it with D300 and love what I see. I think it will supplement nicely my 18-200 Nikkor.
    Tomorrow I will go to shoot some more photos of Cincinnati from KY side of the Ohio river. I will try to post them on flickr.

60. Ferry Junigwan M Says:
    September 17th, 2008 at 12:42 pm

    Very great and useful review khoking.it helps me a lot to choose between 11-16 or 12-24 TOKINA.the only problem is that this lens is for DX only .Guess i have to wait another time before jumping to FX cameras no lol.

    Please do post more pics since i really need something to truly convince myself before getting this lens.

    Regards from Indonesia

61. Mik Says:
    September 18th, 2008 at 8:57 am

    Hi Ferry
    Another review of this lens by Ken Rockwell reckons you can use this lens on a FX camera. Yes there is vignetting at 11mm but OK at 15mm. You can crop out the vignetting at 11mm if you wish, Food for thought.
    Regards
    Mik

62. Branden Says:
    September 30th, 2008 at 8:28 am

    How does it compare to the Canon EF-S 10-22mm. I read the Ken’s web and he suggest the Ef-S instead of the Tokina!

63. Tero Says:
    October 4th, 2008 at 5:10 pm

    I really want this lens for my Canon XTi.

    Crap. Where can I get one? Out of stock in most places, and I’m planning to go for a trip to Japan quite soon, so this lens would be so nice for all those sceneries. Crap.

64. Mike Says:
    October 5th, 2008 at 11:12 am

    Buy it in Japan!

65. Tero Says:
    October 5th, 2008 at 11:21 am

    Yea, I’m thinking about that option. Only problem is, I really really want to have the lens there, so what if it’s sold out there? That’s why it would be more safe to get it before the trip. I guess it’s about 55k yen in Akihabara?

66. mycke Says:
    October 5th, 2008 at 12:49 pm

    It’s a huge possibility that it won’t be sold out in Japan, after all it’s made there. I think it would be sold out first anywhere else, but in Japan it would be available.

67. KhoKing Says:
    October 5th, 2008 at 6:01 pm

    You should be able to get the lens in big camera shop in Tokyo, but price is not going to be the cheapest.

68. Stewart Says:
    October 22nd, 2008 at 12:09 am

    Just received mine yesterday! What a beautiful lens. I highly recommend this one to anyone interested in wide angle photography!!!!

69. Stewart Says:
    October 31st, 2008 at 12:15 am

    Had some time to play with my new lens. everything is great! sharpest at F5.6, noting much to complain about…

    Pros: Sharp as ever, especially at 5.6, 2.8 for low light conditions, build is great, cheaper than the canon 10-22, faster than the sigma 10-20, cool manual focusing clutch.

    Cons: Doesn’t focus as close as the Canon 10-22, doesn’t focus as fast or as quiet as a real USM lens, petal hood wobbles when placed backwards to store on lens, short focal length (not a bad thing…), and honestly, im really trying to find things wrong with this lens.

    I’ve used almost all ultra wides available for crop sensor cameras for Canon, sigma, canon and now Tokina, minus the tamron. i must say, the Tokina win’s hands down as you all might have read from all the reviews on the net. As my previous post states, this is a beautiful lens, highly recommended!!!

    Stu

70. William Says:
    December 7th, 2008 at 10:45 am

    Hi KhoKing, where is your shop?

71. KhoKing Says:
    December 7th, 2008 at 3:05 pm

    Hi William,

    You can see my shop information at:

    http://shashinki.com/shop/about_us.php

    Thank you!

72. mycke Says:
    December 7th, 2008 at 4:52 pm

    this glass is amazing! just got my copy a couple of days back and all i can say is that it’s razor sharp! hahahaha! love it!

73. Tero Says:
    December 7th, 2008 at 4:57 pm

    I’m so happy I got one for my Japan trip. I think I used it too much, about 85% of pics were taken with this Tokina. But it produced awesome pics, check out the Golden Temple here: http://www.patana.fi/photo/Japan/Kyoto_Nara/index.html
    In all, I took about 2k pics, about 100 of them are displayed: http://www.patana.fi/photo/Japan/index.html

74. William Says:
    December 7th, 2008 at 11:59 pm

    KK,
    Thank you.
    William

75. Adam Says:
    December 8th, 2008 at 12:04 am

    nice images Tero.
    may recommend PTLens to correct distortion.

76. Melanie Says:
    December 13th, 2008 at 3:43 am

    i am only a beginner in photography, just bought my d80 a year ago and i am still using my kit lense and a 55-200mm nikkor. a week ago, i made up my mind in buying a wide angle but its hard when u dont know anything… my first plan is to purchase between sigma 10-22 and a tokina 12-24 but my friend told me about the tokina 11-16, i was amazed by the review.. im doing travel photography so i guess this would really fit my needs, when i checked amazon.com nikon mounts are out of stock and from the rest of the camera stores here in US are all backordered! i was about to give up and purchase the tokina 12-24 suddenly amazon have 2 units! i immediately purchased it then after finalizing my order i went back to the site and found out that they are again out of stock.. I’d be leaving US and go back to my country – Philippines and hope to use this during my beach travels! Hope i can share my pics here… hope to see more reviews!

77. joe bloggs Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 9:51 pm

    I’m just new to the dslr world, so I am still using my kit 18-55 lens. First priority is to get a really good wide angle lens. Im stuck between sigma 10-22, Nikon 12-24, Tokina 12-24 and the Tokina 11-16. I believe only the sigma in this range will have auto focus to work on Nikon D40. I have heard auto focus is not as much a priority on wide angle lenses..my question is to anyone who has a d40 using any of the Tokina lenses is it worth purchasing even though I will have to manual focus or should I go with the Sigma 10-20 which has AF, some pretty good reviews and is cheaper? Or should I just go all out for the 11-16 some day down the track will upgrade to auto focus equiped body?

78. mycke Says:
    December 19th, 2008 at 12:00 pm

    hi melanie, the tokina 11-16 is in stock at Henry’s in Hidalgo, I suggest you call them up, just got mine a couple of weeks ago.

79. melanie Says:
    December 20th, 2008 at 7:56 am

    hey mycke, i was able to buy one here in US.. but I havent tried it… hopefully i’ll get used to it… can anyone here recommend what filter to use specially when doing travel photos?? thanks

80. dwi Says:
    December 21st, 2008 at 3:09 am

    it’s nice lense,but now i’m a student. hehe… i don’t have enough money for buy this lense,
    but nice review

81. Stewart Says:
    January 23rd, 2009 at 8:34 am

    Melanie, i have a Rodenstock on mine right now… seems to do a pretty good job… it’s not coated or anything, but the glass seems pretty good

82. Michael Miller Says:
    April 28th, 2009 at 3:23 am

    Kho Kho King,
    Thank you very much for your review. I am in the market for a W/A lens now.

    First, I had to scroll down about 150 meters to get to the bottom of these comments.
    Second, your daughter is beautiful and aware. I don’t think I’d let my grandchildren that close!
    Third, it always amazes me that with the internet I can talk to people from just about any country. That is amazing!

    Thanks again,

    Michael
    Connecticut USA

83. KhoKing Says:
    May 1st, 2009 at 8:24 pm

    Hi Michael,

    Thank you for dropping by. This is a lens that I think no one will regret buying, or can get a better version even from OEM.

84. George G Says:
    May 12th, 2009 at 4:14 am

    Tokina 11mm – 16mm F/2.8 ATX Pro DX Autofocus Zoom for the NIkon. I am trying to buy in US but cannot find anyone who has stock. Can someone assist?

85. cascais Says:
    May 23rd, 2009 at 6:35 pm

    Read so many good things about this lens. Tried very hard not to buy it…I failed. Got one from Mayer’s in Hidalgo(Manila) 3days ago…definitely no regrets! Beautiful, beautiful lens indeed.

    @ KhoKing: Your partly to blame why I am now P29k poorer hehe…more power!

86. KhoKing Says:
    May 23rd, 2009 at 6:51 pm

    Congrates on the new toy!

87. elizer s. magno Says:
    May 31st, 2009 at 9:26 am

    wow! kakainggit

88. Mel D. Says:
    June 8th, 2009 at 4:27 pm

    bought mine last december when they’re back-ordered… I am just lucky to browse amazon few minutes earlier than the others! there! got my very own tokina 11-16! I will post my sample pics soon….

89. Faizal Says:
    June 12th, 2009 at 11:09 pm

    Hi KhoKing,
    I just got Tokina 11-16mm from my friend which he bought from shashinki in March 2009. I notice this lens is backfocus in autofocus mode when used it on my D80 and D70. When I set to manual focus, it is really sharp as in your test potrait. I’m little bit worried when read some forum about 11-16mm on D80, says that it is the lens problem and the send back to the shop. Can you comment on this and if it is the lens, how I should return back to shashinki for warranty? Thank you.

90. KhoKing Says:
    June 12th, 2009 at 11:19 pm

    Hi Faizal,

    Please email shop@shashinki.com for product warranty request. We need the original customer info as well. Please ask the customer/your seller to email us.

91. Faizal Says:
    June 12th, 2009 at 11:32 pm

    I just got it yesterday from my friend and tested it today. I will email to you the detail of the product warranty. Thank you for prompt reply.

92. Ming Says:
    October 26th, 2009 at 6:34 pm

    KKK, is IS an issue for the Tokina 11-16mm?

93. KhoKing Says:
    October 26th, 2009 at 6:49 pm

    Hi Ming,

    There is NO IS in Tokina 116 and for me there is no need of IS in such wide angle lens.

94. Ming Says:
    October 26th, 2009 at 7:00 pm

    Thanks. The only thing holding me back was the fact that there is no IS. Will this be an issue in low light condition?

95. Pharm Says:
    November 20th, 2009 at 10:35 am

    I wish to get one of this! But, is there any difference between the gold ring version and the silver ring version? As the 11-16 I saw in Tokina’s web is with golden ring, whereas the one you’re selling shows otherwise. And yes, they’ll both 11-16.

96. KhoKing Says:
    November 20th, 2009 at 10:39 am

    Hi Pharm,

    Not sure why the difference. The Tokina 116 lens shown above is bought in Japan.

97. kostas Says:
    January 19th, 2010 at 4:57 pm

    impressive lens – especially for its price
    i love the 2nd daughter’s photo – she looks groovy already ;D
    thx for sharing & take care

98. Tokina AT-X 11-16/2.8 Pro DX | Klassefotos Says:
    September 8th, 2010 at 4:12 am

    [...] Ken Rockwell Tokina 11-16mm 2.8Noch ein Test mit Bildern Bilder mit dem Tokina 11-16mm 2.8Das meint Photozone Dieser Beitrag wurde unter Objektivvergleich abgelegt und mit 11-16, 12-24, Nikon, Test, Tokina, UWW verschlagwortet. Setze ein Lesezeichen auf den Permalink. ← Projekt “Hintergrundbilder” Der 51. Geburtstag von Raymund → [...]

99. lee Says:
    September 9th, 2010 at 8:47 pm

    hello…i want to ask 1 question….is this tokina 11-16mm can be use with d300s

100. KhoKing Says:
     September 9th, 2010 at 9:00 pm

     Hi Lee,

     Can.

101. lee Says:
     September 9th, 2010 at 9:23 pm

     tq… i thought it not fit with d300s…tq…tq

102. faizzaki Says:
     October 8th, 2010 at 4:47 am

     thanks for the review

103. MK HO Says:
     December 20th, 2010 at 10:39 pm

     Hi KK, I am awaiting for my Nikon D3100 which is their latest entry level DSLR. Is Tokina AT-X 11-16/2.8 suitable for this D3100. I understand that the auto focus of this len will not work in Nikon D3100 and MF is the only way to go. Is this true and do you think Tokina will be marketing a new version of this len that will take care of the AF shortcoming face in Nikon. Thanks.

104. lee Says:
     January 10th, 2011 at 11:20 am

     i already bought it…….very2222 satisfy with this lense

105. Ishak Says:
     March 9th, 2011 at 5:41 pm

     Hi Dr. KK. Is this lense suitable for potraiture photography. Thanks!!

106. KhoKing Says:
     March 9th, 2011 at 5:42 pm

     Hi Ishak,
     For me, yes. It can create very unique view, however, should not shoot too many similar shots using this lens, else people will feel boring.

107. Ishak Says:
     March 11th, 2011 at 2:48 pm

     Thanks!, sorry for asking again “how come people will feel boring”

108. KhoKing Says:
     March 11th, 2011 at 2:52 pm

     For too many similar shots using the ultra wide angle, people get boring.

109. First day with the Tokina 11-16mm F/2.8 and review round-up | in focus - a malaysian photography blog Says:
     March 22nd, 2011 at 11:20 pm

     [...] Dr Koh Kho King’s blog [...]

Leave a Reply